Gatani Lens: Microsoft fiscal 2025 research notes Reviewed October 31, 2026 These are Gatani paraphrases and research interpretations, not verbatim quotations. Open each original document for its full context. Figures describe the stated historical reporting period, not current market conditions. What is changing in Microsoft’s cloud business? Azure growth accelerated Source: Microsoft annual report 2025 https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html Section: Intelligent Cloud / fiscal years ended June 30 Source summary: Azure and other cloud services revenue grew 34% in fiscal 2025, compared with 30% reported for fiscal 2024. Related context: The fiscal 2024 annual report recorded 30% growth in Azure and other cloud services revenue. Related source: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar24/index.html Research interpretation: Growth increased between the two reported fiscal years. That comparison alone does not establish how much came from AI workloads. Next question: What additional disclosure would separate AI demand from growth in the wider Azure business? Cloud margin fell as infrastructure scaled Source: Microsoft annual report 2025 https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html Section: Summary results / Microsoft Cloud gross margin Source summary: Microsoft Cloud gross margin was 69% in fiscal 2025. The company identified AI infrastructure scaling as a pressure, partly offset by Azure efficiencies. Related context: Microsoft Cloud gross margin was 71% in fiscal 2024, with the report discussing infrastructure costs, efficiencies, and sales mix. Related source: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar24/index.html Research interpretation: Revenue growth and margin expansion are separate questions. A growing business can carry a different infrastructure cost profile. Next question: Which costs reflect near-term capacity expansion, and which persist as the business scales? Cash generation and investment need separate views Source: Microsoft annual report 2025 https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html Section: Cash flows / operating and investing activities Source summary: Operating cash flow reached $136.2 billion in fiscal 2025. Additions to property and equipment increased by $20.1 billion versus the prior year. Related context: Fiscal 2024 operating cash flow was $118.5 billion. The cash-flow statement separately presents investment in property and equipment. Related source: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar24/index.html Research interpretation: Stronger operating cash generation does not answer the separate question of the cash required to build infrastructure. Next question: How should the research brief distinguish operating cash generation, capital spending, and lease commitments? What should follow Microsoft’s earnings release? Quarterly growth needs its own period Source: Microsoft FY25 Q4 earnings release https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/earnings/FY-2025-Q4/press-release-webcast Section: July 30, 2025 / quarter ended June 30, 2025 Source summary: Revenue for the June 2025 quarter was $76.4 billion, an 18% year-over-year increase. Constant-currency growth was 17%. Related context: The annual report presents fiscal-year revenue of $281.7 billion, up 15%. The annual and quarterly measures cover different periods. Related source: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html Research interpretation: A quarterly result and a fiscal-year result should retain their own period labels. Neither substitutes for the other. Next question: Does each comparison in the brief identify the period and currency basis it uses? Cloud revenue and Azure revenue are different measures Source: Microsoft FY25 Q4 earnings release https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/earnings/FY-2025-Q4/press-release-webcast Section: Management commentary / Microsoft Cloud and Azure Source summary: The release reports quarterly Microsoft Cloud revenue of $46.7 billion. It separately reports annual Azure revenue above $75 billion. Related context: The annual report defines Microsoft Cloud as a group of offerings that includes Azure, Microsoft 365 Commercial cloud, LinkedIn commercial, and Dynamics 365. Related source: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html Research interpretation: A category label and its time period are part of the evidence. Treating Cloud and Azure as interchangeable would change the claim. Next question: Which metric definition belongs beside the growth figure your team is discussing? Keep the next question attached to the result Source: Microsoft FY25 Q4 earnings release https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/earnings/FY-2025-Q4/press-release-webcast Section: Business results / research follow-up Source summary: The earnings release provides reported results and management commentary. The annual report adds accounting policies, risks, and cash-flow context. Related context: A headline growth figure summarizes one reported comparison; it does not supply the complete context for an investment thesis. Related source: https://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar25/index.html Research interpretation: The next step is a source-linked research question, rather than a forecast inferred from one headline. Next question: Which annual-report passage would strengthen, qualify, or challenge the interpretation of this result?